In the modern era, man’s thinking has become increasingly anthropocentric, man-centered, so that Scripture itself has been subjected to an anti-theological interpretation.
The recent enthusiasm for gay civil unions and the proposal for a Federal Marriage Amendment have made homosexuality a major issue. According to gay propaganda, Adam and Steve simply wish to marry, secure a home and mortgage, adopt 1.7 children, and settle down to life-long, monogamous marital bliss. This idyllic picture of homosexual goals is a ridiculous fabrication. In truth, the homosexual agenda is revolutionary and seeks to overthrow the Biblical foundation for society.
uring the week of July 11, the phone lines were burning up in Washington, D.C. and in Senate district offices all over the nation.
Long before the same-sex marriage controversy, heterosexuals were demeaning and degrading the institution of marriage by frequent abandonment.
With all the wrangling over same-sex marriage within both secular and religious circles, the debate seems stalemated. And one reason Christian debaters have not succeeded is that they overlook one simple fact: Biblical love is not based on romance.
In the first part of this series, I wrote about the cultural mandate from God to seek dominion in the realm of movies.
Tracking bad news, as I do, can get to you. For me, recently, the last straw was the appointment of an avowed homosexual, owner of a “leather bar,” to be president of the school board in Asbury Park , New Jersey.
Dr. Cobin’s book Bible and Government is one of the most thought-provoking books I have read in quite some time. By questioning the necessity for civil government, Cobin hopes to provide an alternative to the incoherent statist nationalism that passes for most Christian political thought.