Access your downloads at our archive site. Visit Archive
Not guilty

“Not Guilty” by Reason of Victimhood

One of the most common means whereby we justify bad behavior is by claiming victimization, that we are, in fact, the victims of another.

Mark R. Rushdoony
  • Mark R. Rushdoony,
Share this

One of the most common means whereby we justify bad behavior is by claiming victimization, that we are, in fact, the victims of another. Claiming victimhood is to claim innocence, or at least non-liability because of the greater guilt of another.

Adam blamed Eve and, ultimately, God; “The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat” (Gen. 3:12, emphasis added).

Eve also claimed to be the victim: “The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat” (v. 13). Passing the buck is about more than evading responsibility; it is an attempt to pass responsibility to another.

Spouses often blame problems on each other. Parents blame children for making their life so hard, and children blame parents for their failures, real or imagined. Karl Marx blamed capitalists for man’s social and economic problems and taught all succeeding political and social engineers the power of contrived guilt. Both employee and employers often claim to be victims of the other. Most nauseating are the criminals whose defense is in their own victimization by others.

It is easy to claim we are victims because everyone around us is a sinner. Much sin does produce human victims. Victimization, though, is about more than being a victim; it is a means of justifying behavior. It says that sin is not our fault because ours is the lesser offense.

If we say we are victims, it means someone else is a victimizer. It means someone else is guilty and must be punished. Victimization is a plea of “not guilty” because someone else is. Victims are not punished, but victimizers are. It means a person or group must be punished. If men are said to be victimized by an idea or movement, victimization is a demand that justice mobilize against someone or something else. This can even be a law or concept of justice. The pro-abortion movement’s great public relations coup was when it made the women who kill their children out to be the victims of “back alley abortions.” Abortion went from being a criminal act to a form of victimization of women.

Even if it is correct in pointing out the offenses of others, victimization only deals with the human aspect of sin. Sin is often against man, but it is always against God. Theft is an offense against a man and his property, but it is first and foremost against the moral law of God. The justification of victimhood ignores sin as a moral offense against God and focuses exclusively on its violation of man. Victimization is not about transcendent justice, it is about transferring responsibility to another person, group, or idea.

Adam and Eve passed the buck, but God pronounced judgment on each of them because each was held accountable for his or her rebellion. The extent to which they were victimized did not in any way lessen the seriousness or the consequences of their sin.

Man is most of all a victim of his own sinful nature, the guilt of which, but for the grace of God in Christ Jesus, he would have to bear entirely on his own. The two categories of man are not victims and victimizers but the old man in Adam and the new man in Christ. Justifying sin by claiming another is responsible for our sinfulness is to ignore that all sin is a violation of transcendent divine justice. It denies our culpability to judgment and is a defense that will not stand before the judgment seat of God.

Mark R. Rushdoony
  • Mark R. Rushdoony

Mark R. Rushdoony graduated from Los Angeles Baptist College (now The Master’s College) with a B.A. in history in 1975 and was ordained to the ministry in 1995.

He taught junior and senior high classes in history, Bible, civics and economics at a Christian school in Virginia for three years before joining the staff of Chalcedon in 1978. He was the Director of Chalcedon Christian School for 14 years while teaching full time. He also helped tutor all of his children through high school.

In 1998, he became the President of Chalcedon and Ross House Books, and, more recently another publishing arm, Storehouse Press. Chalcedon and its subsidiaries publish many titles plus CDs, mp3s, and an extensive online archive at His biography of his father will be published later this year (2024).

He has written scores of articles for Chalcedon’s publications, both the Chalcedon Report and Faith for all of Life. He was a contributing author to The Great Christian Revolution (1991). He has spoken at numerous conferences and churches in the U.S. and abroad.

Mark Rushdoony has lived in Vallecito, California, since 1978.  His wife, Darlene, and he have been married since 1976. His youngest son still resides with him. He has three married children and nine grandchildren.

More by Mark R. Rushdoony