Reformed Fortune-Tellers: Judgment, America and the Prophets of Doom
Was less than the number murdered in America every day by abortionists. ('Nuff said, right?)
Except that it isn’t enough said. Not quite.
First of all, a rather large part of the church’s mission is to disciple the nations, a task which notably includes those weaker brothers around us who couldn’t tell exegesis from an X-Box. If only for their sakes, shouldn’t we try to avoid looking really, really dumb? None of us are prophets: why, then, insist on playing Hal Lindsey, breathlessly pronouncing God’s Certain Judgment Right Now? So we can seem “smarter,” or more “spiritual”? Many pay an eternal price for such indulgences of false humility.
And sure, the doomsayers may prove correct: our enemies’ next move may be an atomic bomb in New York, and after that no one’s going to think Afghanistan a great victory. But why assume this, instead of preaching a more balanced message of repentance and righteousness, without the parochial hysteria? Must Reformed folk always shoot from the lip?
Second, there is a deep presuppositional issue here. There has arisen in Reformed life a kind of odd mirror of the most radical dispensationalists, a sort of “Judge America First” crowd, certain that the world will go on but that America is and ought to be immediately doomed.
There are some serious problems with this position, the most obvious being (for people who believe in God’s sovereign election) that, whereas the rest of the Western world has apostatized in the past two centuries, America continues to have vast numbers of Christians, both in absolute numbers and as a percentage of total population. Moreover, everyone in Reformed circles who isn’t hiding behind his computer screen knows that in the past two decades, there has been a tremendous upsurge both in numbers and in interest in our position.
And anyway, if God wants us ruined, what’s He waiting for? Just in the years since Roe, He could have annihilated or enslaved us by the hand of the Soviets, could have wiped out our modern technological society in an instant through Y2K, could have killed us all with AIDS, could have destroyed us in any number of ways. He didn’t. In fact, He preserved us while destroying others. Whole nations in Africa are being wiped out by AIDS, but not us. The Soviets collapsed, but not us. The empire of every apostate Western country is stripped away, but we remain.
And within America, who actually benefits from our major national sins? We return to abortion: does abortion require national judgment, or is abortion itself the national judgment, targeted very precisely at the darkened minds and hearts of the people most in rebellion, maiming and killing their own flesh and blood (which is to say, their posterity). If the wicked continue to murder their own for another generation or two, and the righteous continue to have huge home-schooled families and propagate their faith as they go, where exactly is the need for any additional wrath? And what will the demographics be righteous vs. reprobate at the end of that time (a time, by the way, when an overwhelming majority will certainly vote an end to abortion)?
The “Judge America First” crowd sees none of this. And maybe they’re right. Maybe God wants not merely to chasten America, or reform America, but to destroy America. Maybe that is His plan, and even the only righteous course He could possibly take.
But if Afghanistan has shown us anything, it’s this: men who don’t want to look foolish don’t call the game in the first quarter.
Copyright: Rod D. Martin, 31 December 2001.